OH, This is Pretty! Down By The Salley Gardens

This is a song to a poem by W B Yeats. What pretty pictures!

I am editing to add this, because when you go on youtube, it show other videos like the one you find, so this one was on one of the Salley Garden ones. BUT, Oh this is almost the same song, but they kill people!!! OH the grunty little malebeast!!!!

Then edit some more to add this to them, by Nick Cave.

This is a fun thing to do on youtube, just start somewhere and start following the other songs where they lead you. But sometimes it gets really weird.

Squeeky Fromm
Girl Reporter

Yoohoo!. . .Paul Krugman!. . .Where Are You???

They Knew Where She Was, But Where Was He???

Well now if this doesn’t just beat all. One of the victims of the Tucson shooter has threatened a Tea Party member. The threat wasn’t just some cross hairs on a election map. Or somebody calling the other side of the political spectrum names, in an un-civil and toned-UP manner. Oh no. This person, James Eric Fuller, came right out at a televised Town Hall meeting, and shot a picture of Trent Humphries, a co-founder of the Tucson Tea Party, and said “You’re dead!”

Apparently James Eric Fuller has NOT put rambling crazy things on youtube, or took pictures of himself in a red G-string with a gun. Apparently, James Eric Fuller has NOT acted weird in the past and scared his schoolmates. So probably, this is POLITICAL!!!

Soooo where is Paul Krugman??? It only took two hours for him to blame the Tucson Massacre on Republicans, talk show hosts, and the Tea Party. That bunch of GHOULISH recrimination turned out to be a dud. It only took a few hours for Sarah Palin to be crucified for using the term “blood libel” in her response to the nonsense. One would have thought emotionally distraught Jews were jumping out of windows all across the country the way the Left was carrying on. Meanwhile, the sane Jews, like Alan Dershowitz, were saying it was no big deal and the term has come to have a broader use.

Naturally then, one expects the Left and Liberals and Democrats to denounce their own GHOULISHNESS which led to this latest threat. But strangely, I don’t see it anywhere??? What happened??? These people acted like they were sincere in their accusations??? Were they just lying??? Was all the blame just to gain some political points over the dead bodies in Tucson, including the poor little dead child??? Was it all just to not miss “taking advantage of a good crisis’??? Because if it was, then GHOULISHNESS is putting it nicely!!!

Squeeky Fromm
Girl Reporter

How People Brainwash You and Manipulate You

Here is a good example of how people mess with your mind. I found this story, about the “The 5 Dumbest Things You Can Do If You Have Too Much Debt.”


Real surprisingly is number 5, which says ” Declaring bankruptcy – this can have permanent and severe consequences on your financial future, avoid if you can, especially when debt settlement may work for you…:”

Because I am wondering why this is dumb if you are in credit trouble. Getting rid of your debt seems pretty SMART to me. But as you read the article, you notice 3 links to “Elite Financial”, which is (Would you ever have guessed it??) a debt settlement company.

So, OF COURSE, they don’t want you to take bankruptcy. Oh no, instead, they want you to use them and pay them money, no matter what might be best for you. But the story is written like it is a real story, not just a hidden sneaky commercial.

This is really sneaky and underhanded, but it happens all the time. Karl Denninger at Market Ticker writes about this kind of thing, and a question he asks is, “When do real estate agents ever say now is NOT a good time to buy a house?” or when do car salesmen ever say “Now is NOT a good time to buy a car?” He calls CNBC, “CNBS” and says they do this with stocks and stuff, too.

So this is a example of how they do it. How they try to take your money and to heck with you.

Oh, and guess who the story about the 5 Dumbest Things was sponsored by??? In light letters down at the bottom of the article. And still, they don’t tell you about the dog Elite Financial has in this fight.

ANSWER: This article sponsored by Elite Financial Copyright Howlifeworks.com 2010

Squeeky Fromm
Girl Reporter

The Democrats’ HOLLOWcaust!!!

Tabanus Sulcifrons – The Gad-Fly

Oh, the phony baloney crap about the use of the term “blood libel” by Sarah Palin is just DISGUSTING!!! The Democrats are complaining about the use of the term, which originally described some sort of anti-Semitic stuff about eating Christian kids for supper or something. Alan Dershowitz, a famous lawyer, and Jewish to boot, pretty much says it is no big deal and that the term has come to stand for “false accusations” in a general way.

The Anti-Defamation League, which is a Jewish group that tries to “stop defamation of the Jewish people and to secure justice and fair treatment to all”, said pretty much the same thing, that “the term “blood-libel” has become part of the English parlance to refer to someone being falsely accused. . .” They did not particularly like this common usage, but also stated, “it was inappropriate at the outset to blame Sarah Palin and others for causing this tragedy or for being an accessory to murder. Palin has every right to defend herself against these kinds of attacks. . .”

Nonetheless, NEWSPAPER Jews are supposedly upset. TALKING HEAD Jews are supposedly upset. GENTILE Liberals and Leftists and Democrats, like Chris Matthews and Ed Schultz, are having kittens about it, and going through some pretty HYSTERICAL labor pains while doing it.

But, this Girl Reporter has to wonder. What are the REAL Jews doing tonight??? Oh, they are in Israel and are busy dodging missiles, and Muslim suicide bombers. I bet they wish they had the luxury of worrying about this kind of MANUFACTURED baloney!!!

It is my opinion that if anybody should be ashamed, it is NOT Sarah Palin!!! it is the Democrats for invoking the pain of THE Holocaust for their HOLLOWcaust.

Squeeky Fromm
Girl Reporter

Waterloo – What Is it???

The Day After

I have heard a lot about “Waterloo” and I wondered “What is it???” Since “Google is my friend”, I looked it up. Wiki says it was a big fight where Napolean lost and it was all over for him.

The Battle of Waterloo was fought on Sunday 18 June 1815 near Waterloo in present-day Belgium, then part of the United Kingdom of the Netherlands. An Imperial French army under the command of Emperor Napoleon was defeated by combined armies of the Seventh Coalition, an Anglo-Allied army under the command of the Duke of Wellington combined with a Prussian army under the command of Gebhard von Blücher. It was the culminating battle of the Waterloo Campaign and Napoleon’s last. The defeat at Waterloo put an end to Napoleon’s rule as Emperor of the French and marked the end of his Hundred Days’ return from exile. – Napoleon abdicated, surrendered to the British, and was exiled to Saint Helena, where he died in 1821.

Soooo, it looks like Obama is about to get beat real bad, and hopefully he will go to Saint Helena, too, or maybe Saint Kenya! (LOL!!!)

Here is why the French people thought they lost, and it is also a lot like Obama:

A French view of the reasons for Napoleon’s defeat

General Baron Jomini, one of the leading military writers on the Napoleonic art of war had a number of very cogent explanations of the reasons behind Napoleon’s defeat at Waterloo.[142]

In my opinion, four principal causes led to this disaster:

The first, and most influential, was the arrival, skilfully combined, of Blücher, and the false movement that favored this arrival;[143] the second, was the admirable firmness of the British infantry, joined to the sang-froid and aplomb of its chiefs; the third, was the horrible weather, that had softened the ground, and rendered the offensive movements so toilsome, and retarded till one o’clock the attack that should have been made in the morning; the fourth, was the inconceivable formation of the first corps, in masses very much too deep for the first grand attack.

Soooo, I am sure we will be hearing the term “Waterloo” a lot between now and the 2012 elections.

Squeeky Fromm
Girl Reporter

How One Scientist Proved His ED Treatments Worked !!!

Here is how one scientist proved his ED treatments worked:

The Professor wanted to make his case in the most convincing style possible. He indicated that, in his view, no normal person would find the experience of giving a lecture to a large audience to be erotically stimulating or erection-inducing. He had, he said, therefore injected himself with papaverine in his hotel room before coming to give the lecture, and deliberately wore loose clothes (hence the track-suit) to make it possible to exhibit the results. He stepped around the podium, and pulled his loose pants tight up around his genitalia in an attempt to demonstrate his erection.

At this point, I, and I believe everyone else in the room, was agog. I could scarcely believe what was occurring on stage. But Prof. Brindley was not satisfied. He looked down sceptically at his pants and shook his head with dismay. ‘Unfortunately, this doesn’t display the results clearly enough’. He then summarily dropped his trousers and shorts, revealing a long, thin, clearly erect penis. There was not a sound in the room. Everyone had stopped breathing.

But the mere public showing of his erection from the podium was not sufficient. He paused, and seemed to ponder his next move. The sense of drama in the room was palpable. He then said, with gravity, ‘I’d like to give some of the audience the opportunity to confirm the degree of tumescence’. With his pants at his knees, he waddled down the stairs, approaching (to their horror) the urologists and their partners in the front row. As he approached them, erection waggling before him, four or five of the women in the front rows threw their arms up in the air, seemingly in unison, and screamed loudly. The scientific merits of the presentation had been overwhelmed, for them, by the novel and unusual mode of demonstrating the results.

The screams seemed to shock Professor Brindley, who rapidly pulled up his trousers, returned to the podium, and terminated the lecture. The crowd dispersed in a state of flabbergasted disarray. I imagine that the urologists who attended with their partners had a lot of explaining to do. The rest is history. Prof Brindley’s single-author paper reporting these results was published about 6 months later.

Here is the full story:


Ohhhh, what does BJU stand for??? Do I even want to know???

Tee Hee! Tee Hee!

Girl Reporter